m (rewriting {{wp}} links, to make a local wikilink followed by {{wp sup}} (superscript link to Wikipedia))
Line 16: Line 16:


==Options==
==Options==
* [[Ventilated Improved Pit Latrine (Practical Action Technical Brief)]] A simple design for a toilet that can be dug anywhere. Fill the pit with refuse and plant a tree when you are finished!
*[[Composting toilet]]
*[[Composting toilet]]
*[[Biogas]] toilet, too large scale for the specs; for longer term settlement (due to capital cost, time for construction); relatively unproven. (E.g. [http://www.afrigadget.com/2007/03/01/bio-latrines-in-kenyan-slums/ Bio Latrines in Kenyan Slums].)  
*[[Biogas]] toilet, too large scale for the specs; for longer term settlement (due to capital cost, time for construction); relatively unproven. (E.g. [http://www.afrigadget.com/2007/03/01/bio-latrines-in-kenyan-slums/ Bio Latrines in Kenyan Slums].)  

Revision as of 22:28, 23 October 2010

Substitute for pit latrines, septic systems or conventional sewage handling with:

Financial model:

Possibly as cheap as $20 per household in warm areas, assuming shared toilet banks. Practical, realistic designs have not undergone the "value engineering" necessary for this application yet, so are still too costly, although clearly a cheap, basic, functional unit for any given climate could be created.

Water System

Priorities

  • public health is the overwhelming priority.
  • low cost is essential - if it's not cheap, it won't be used as much and won't achieve as much.
  • low ecological impact is very desirable if it doesn't compromise public health.
  • suitable for various cultural practices. Target users may be accustomed to using water to cleanse (but can most often cope with small amounts of water), or other anal cleansingW methods, so the device should ideally tolerate sticks, rocks, paper, or whatever else is likely to be thrown in.

Options

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.