m (typo/grammar)
(wl, cat)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WP|Evidence based practice}} or {{WP|Evidence-based medicine}} has been defined as "integration of best research with clinical expertise, patient values, and available resources." <ref>[http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/312/7023/71 Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ 1996;312:71-72.]</ref>  
{{WP|Evidence based practice}} or {{WP|Evidence-based medicine}} has been defined as "integration of best research with clinical expertise, patient values, and available resources." <ref>[http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/312/7023/71 Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ 1996;312:71-72.]</ref>


==EBP and Appropriate Technology==
==EBP and Appropriate Technology==


Appropriate technology and EBP share a common goal of providing solutions that are effective for the individual and the community.  
[[Appropriate technology]] and EBP share a common goal of providing solutions that are effective for the individual and the community.


==Criticism of EBP==
==Criticism of EBP==
Evidence-based practice has been criticized includes the exclusion of under-represented groups from the studies on which the evidence is based. This may be especially true as research is often profit driven by producers of medical technology who seek more affluent populations to market their goods. As well, some feel that the method of passing information from the "expert" to the "base" fosters dependence and discourages individual thinking at the local level <ref>[http://healthwrights.org/books/HHWL/HHWLchapt15.pdf Helping Health Workers Learn: Appropriate and Inappropriate Technology (see page 15-3 "Re-examining some common assumptions" and page 15-8 "Example 3").]</ref>
Evidence-based practice has been criticized includes the exclusion of under-represented groups from the studies on which the evidence is based. This may be especially true as research is often profit driven by producers of medical technology who seek more affluent populations to market their goods. As well, some feel that the method of passing information from the "expert" to the "base" fosters dependence and discourages individual thinking at the local level <ref>[http://healthwrights.org/books/HHWL/HHWLchapt15.pdf Helping Health Workers Learn: Appropriate and Inappropriate Technology (see page 15-3 "Re-examining some common assumptions" and page 15-8 "Example 3").]</ref>


==Articles and References==
==Articles and References==
Line 16: Line 15:


[http://jme.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/30/2/141 Evidence based medicine and justice: a framework for looking at the impact of EBM upon vulnerable or disadvantaged groups W A Rogers. 27 November 2003]
[http://jme.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/30/2/141 Evidence based medicine and justice: a framework for looking at the impact of EBM upon vulnerable or disadvantaged groups W A Rogers. 27 November 2003]
[[Category:Medical care]]

Revision as of 01:37, 5 March 2008

W or W has been defined as "integration of best research with clinical expertise, patient values, and available resources." [1]

EBP and Appropriate Technology

Appropriate technology and EBP share a common goal of providing solutions that are effective for the individual and the community.

Criticism of EBP

Evidence-based practice has been criticized includes the exclusion of under-represented groups from the studies on which the evidence is based. This may be especially true as research is often profit driven by producers of medical technology who seek more affluent populations to market their goods. As well, some feel that the method of passing information from the "expert" to the "base" fosters dependence and discourages individual thinking at the local level [2]

Articles and References

Feminism and health ethics

Evidence based medicine and justice: a framework for looking at the impact of EBM upon vulnerable or disadvantaged groups W A Rogers. 27 November 2003

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.