Line 60: Line 60:
* [http://www.realbusiness.com/2014/10/big-ideas/new-technology-that-helps-the-environment/ New Technology That Helps the Environment] - Real Business
* [http://www.realbusiness.com/2014/10/big-ideas/new-technology-that-helps-the-environment/ New Technology That Helps the Environment] - Real Business
* [https://www.engineeringforchange.org/news/2014/01/17/3d_printers_may_be_poised_to_take_off_in_developing_countries.html 3D printers may be poised to take off in developing countries] - Engineering for Change
* [https://www.engineeringforchange.org/news/2014/01/17/3d_printers_may_be_poised_to_take_off_in_developing_countries.html 3D printers may be poised to take off in developing countries] - Engineering for Change
* [https://www.trinckle.com/blog/how-eco-friendly-is-3d-printing-in-2015/ How Eco-Friendly is 3D Printing in 2015?] - Trinkle


[[Category:MOST completed projects and publications]]
[[Category:MOST completed projects and publications]]

Revision as of 01:08, 18 June 2015

Source

Greenreprap.jpg

Megan Kreiger and Joshua M. Pearce (2013). Environmental Life Cycle Analysis of Distributed 3-D Printing and Conventional Manufacturing of Polymer Products, ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering,1 (12), (2013) pp. 1511–1519. DOI: 10.1021/sc400093k Open access

Discussion on how 3D printing is green on Living on Earth - PRI's Environmental News Magazine - Listen

Abstract

With the recent development of the RepRap, an open-source self-replicating rapid prototyper, low-cost 3-D printing is now a technically viable form of distributed manufacturing of polymer-based products. However, the aggregate environmental benefits of distributed manufacturing are not clear due to scale reductions and the potential for increases in embodied energy. To quantify the environmental impact of distributed manufacturing using 3-D printers, a life cycle analysis was performed on three plastic products. The embodied energy and emissions from conventional large-scale production in low-labor cost countries and shipping are compared to experimental measurements on a RepRap with and without solar photovoltaic (PV) power fabricating products with acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) and polylactic acid (PLA). The results indicate that the cumulative energy demand of manufacturing polymer products can be reduced by 41-64% (55-74% with PV) and concomitant emission reductions using distributed manufacturing with existing low-cost open-source 3-D printers when using <25% fill PLA. Less pronounced positive environmental results are observed with ABS, which demands higher temperatures for the print bed and extruder. Overall, the results indicate that distributed manufacturing using open-source 3-D printers has the potential to have a lower environmental impact than conventional manufacturing for a variety of products.

See Also

Method

In the News

3D Print. Save the Planet.
Error in widget YouTube: Unable to load template 'wiki:YouTube'
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.