(adding text)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Photowanted}}
{{Photowantedsca}}
Draft for posting to [http://wiki.idealgovernment.com/participation The IdealGovernment Wiki : participation] / posted [[User:Philralph|Philralph]] @[[w:c:sca21:Sustainable Community Action:Community Portal|<span style="color:Green;">'''sca21'''</span>]] 15:59, February 10, 2010 (UTC)
''Draft for posting to [http://wiki.idealgovernment.com/participation The IdealGovernment Wiki : participation] / posted [[User:Philralph|Philralph]] @[[w:c:sca21:Sustainable Community Action:Community Portal|<span style="color:Green;">'''sca21'''</span>]] 15:59, February 10, 2010 (UTC)''




Line 10: Line 10:
*the design, practice and assessment of participation processes themselves, as well as enabling citizens to influence both  
*the design, practice and assessment of participation processes themselves, as well as enabling citizens to influence both  
*the broad direction and the detail of policy.
*the broad direction and the detail of policy.
{{Localforumcomm}}
 
Open design specifically includes  
Open design specifically includes  
* the scope and context of involvement processes  
* the scope and context of involvement processes  
Line 31: Line 31:
Participation as a whole tends to become an ongoing process, or at least a process which is always open. Online records are permanently open and kept permanently. Fully open and complete online records of involvement and influence, help provide recognition, reward, respect, trust, and, last but not least, learning and not having to keep reinventing the wheel. Government, along with and within communities of interest involved, learns to become a learning community in its fullest sense.
Participation as a whole tends to become an ongoing process, or at least a process which is always open. Online records are permanently open and kept permanently. Fully open and complete online records of involvement and influence, help provide recognition, reward, respect, trust, and, last but not least, learning and not having to keep reinventing the wheel. Government, along with and within communities of interest involved, learns to become a learning community in its fullest sense.


=== Related ===
== See also ==
 
*[[Community involvement]]
{{Rels2
*[[Community involvement UK]]
|
{{localforum}}
 


*[[Participatory budgeting UK]]
*[[Sustainable Communities Act]]
*[[Ukgc10]]
|*{{WP|BarCamp}}
*{{WP|Coproduction of public services by service users and communities}}
*[http://www.greenlivingpedia.org/Web_3 Web 3], on greenlivingpedia (deleted from Wikipedia)
* [[w:c:wethink|We-think]]
* [[w:c:collaboration:Collaborative_intelligence|Collaborative intelligence]]
|
}}


{{scaendmenu}}
[[category:Community involvement]]


{{End Menu2IB}}


'''Notes and references'''
'''Notes and references'''
{{Attrib sca ref|Citizen centred participation}}
* Citizens at the Center: A New Approach to Civic Engagement, [http://www.casefoundation.org/spotlight/civic_engagement/summary The Case Foundation], 2006
* Citizens at the Center: A New Approach to Civic Engagement, [http://www.casefoundation.org/spotlight/civic_engagement/summary The Case Foundation], 2006
*"People first - The review has confirmed our starting conviction that in order to understand participation we need to understand it from the point of view of the individuals doing it... Much of the literature on participation, and particularly on public participation, tends to start with the institutions..." [http://pathwaysthroughparticipation.org.uk/2010/01/understanding-participation-a-literature-review/ Understanding participation: A literature review], p.40, pathwaysthroughparticipation.org.uk, December 2009   
*"People first - The review has confirmed our starting conviction that in order to understand participation we need to understand it from the point of view of the individuals doing it... Much of the literature on participation, and particularly on public participation, tends to start with the institutions..." [http://pathwaysthroughparticipation.org.uk/2010/01/understanding-participation-a-literature-review/ Understanding participation: A literature review], p.40, pathwaysthroughparticipation.org.uk, December 2009   

Revision as of 07:19, 9 July 2015

Template:Photowantedsca Draft for posting to The IdealGovernment Wiki : participation / posted Philralph @sca21 15:59, February 10, 2010 (UTC)


Online participation needs to be considered in the context of participation as a whole. In the main, for the forseeable future, online participation will be just one part of a wider mix. Particpation here is used to include participation by citizens with government, local government and institutional civic society.[1]

Citizen centred participation as the name suggests, is an approach that puts the needs, aspirations and wellbeing of citizens at the heart of participation. This contrasts with a more traditional approach which put the needs of organisations at the centre, often treated them as paramount, and sometimes as the only needs worthy of consideration.

Citizen centred participation in policy making opens up, to citizen involvement, both

  • the design, practice and assessment of participation processes themselves, as well as enabling citizens to influence both
  • the broad direction and the detail of policy.

Open design specifically includes

  • the scope and context of involvement processes
  • any stages or processes necessary to synthesize participation responses

and where necessary

  • conflict resolution processes

Citizen centred participation specifically involves citizens in building communities of interest relevant to policy making.

It also gives citizens a primary role in evaluating the involvement processes themselves. The test for success is no longer defined in terms of what success might mean for an organisation, but what success means to the citizens involved.

Such an approach both relies on, but also builds on transparency and open government. For example if there are reasons why organisational interests need to be given weight in the design of a participation process, then these reasons should be capable of standing up to public scrutiny.

The ethos underlying citizen centred participation is that of government as the enabler of the wellbeing of us all. Such a goal transcends the narrower focus of organisational self interest.

Opportunities for involvement are designed to be open to all interested parties, not just a favoured few. Opportunities for involvement recognise and value citizens being proactive not just reactive. Government recognises that some opportunities for involvement will be citizen-created and citizen-organised. Not only does government support and encourage such intitiatives but is also open to the idea of fully and appropriately engaging within them.

Citizens are enabled to influence policy in both direct and more subtle ways.

Participation as a whole tends to become an ongoing process, or at least a process which is always open. Online records are permanently open and kept permanently. Fully open and complete online records of involvement and influence, help provide recognition, reward, respect, trust, and, last but not least, learning and not having to keep reinventing the wheel. Government, along with and within communities of interest involved, learns to become a learning community in its fullest sense.

See also



Notes and references Template:Attrib sca ref

  1. Citizen with citizen involvement is not specifically mentioned here even though it may be a large part of any participation process. The discussion here focusses on participation with at least some institutional or organisational involvement. Citizen with citizen involvement can concern questions of civic value. What constitutes civic value should be a discussion which is itself open to citizen involvement.
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.