The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Do you have expertise? Please consider applying to be a topic expert on the discussion tab above. Feel free to request a new or existing topic category and see [[:Category:Topics needing experts]]. | Do you have expertise? Please consider applying to be a topic expert on the discussion tab above. Feel free to request a new or existing topic category and see [[:Category:Topics needing experts]]. | ||
==Topic Moderator Discussion== | |||
The idea behind having and showing topic category moderators is: | |||
#bring higher credibility to Appropedia | |||
#bring more experts to Appropedia through incorporation | |||
#maintain and encourage quality | |||
The [[Appropedia:Topic experts|topic experts]] page should have guidelines on: | |||
#the responsibilities of the topic expert | |||
#how to become a topic expert (e.g. description | |||
#how the topic expert is replaced (e.g. after no reply in one month) | |||
This would be better if it: | |||
# could be administered not in the wiki text | |||
# would show up below articles and subcategories | |||
''these changes will probably take a progammer'' | |||
Currently I am the moderator for many [[:Category:Topic|topic categories]]. I have in mind a few experts for some of the topic categories, such as adobe and cobb. Are there any offers, e.g. [[User:Singkong2005|Singkong2005]] (now known as [[User:Chriswaterguy| Chriswaterguy]]) for [[:Category:Open source]]? | |||
What do you think? --[[User:Lonny|Lonny]] 23:32, 14 October 2006 (PDT) | |||
== User boxes and tracking changes == | == User boxes and tracking changes == |