(remove now-unnecessary double brackets from Template:Shortcut parameter)
mNo edit summary
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
Scientific [[Appropedia:Rigor|rigor]] is encouraged.
Scientific [[Appropedia:Rigor|rigor]] is encouraged.


However, users are advised that articles are generally not [[Appropedia:Peer review|peer reviewed]] unless tagged with the appropriate template notice.<ref>There are plans for some form of peer review procedure on Appropedia, but as of May 2007 this is not in place.</ref>
However, users are advised that articles are generally not [[Appropedia:Peer review|peer reviewed]] unless tagged with the appropriate template notice.<ref>There are plans for some form of peer review procedure on Appropedia, but as of 2012 this is not in place.</ref>
 
However, Appropedia has been shown to be a useful platform for open source research in sustainability. <ref> Joshua M. Pearce, “Open Source Research in Sustainability”, ''Sustainability: the Journal of Record'', '''5'''(4), pp. 238-243, 2012. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/sus.2012.9944 DOI] [http://mtu.academia.edu/JoshuaPearce/Papers/1867941/Open_Source_Research_in_Sustainability free and open access]</ref>


==See also==
==See also==
Line 20: Line 22:
<small><references/></small>
<small><references/></small>


{{DEFAULTSORT:{{PAGENAME}}}}
 
[[Category:Appropedia policy]]
[[Category:Appropedia policy]]

Revision as of 18:21, 16 August 2012

Template:Shortcut

Appropedia, unlike Wikipedia, encourages the posting of original research.

Scientific rigor is encouraged.

However, users are advised that articles are generally not peer reviewed unless tagged with the appropriate template notice.[1]

However, Appropedia has been shown to be a useful platform for open source research in sustainability. [2]

See also

Interwiki links

Notes

  1. There are plans for some form of peer review procedure on Appropedia, but as of 2012 this is not in place.
  2. Joshua M. Pearce, “Open Source Research in Sustainability”, Sustainability: the Journal of Record, 5(4), pp. 238-243, 2012. DOI free and open access
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.