This is a suggestion based on Wikipedia:Project:Good articles. It is a way of tracking and improving pages to a point where they can become featured articles, as well as improving the stardard of content on Appropedia.

The Wikipedia page states the following (and it will probably apply here, with minor changes):

Good articles are articles which are considered to be of good quality but which are not yet, or are unlikely to reach featured article quality. Good articles should meet the good article criteria and have passed through the good article nomination process successfully. In short, they should be well written, factually accurate and verifiable, broad in coverage, neutral in point of view, stable, and illustrated, where possible, by relevant images with suitable copyright licenses. Good articles need not be as comprehensive as featured articles, but they should not omit any major facets of the topic: a comparison of the criteria for good and featured articles describes further differences.

For now, we can do all this on one page.

See also

Nominations

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.