Appropedia:Roles/Administrators/Nominations: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 06:31, 13 February 2009

I nominate User:David.reber (as discussed by email with User:Curtbeckmann and User:Lonny).

I wish to nominate him for "community admin" - see Appropedia:Administrators/Process. (That basically means a fully fledged admin. If my suggestion of two levels of adminship doesn't become policy, then this is irrelevant, and I'm just nominating him for admin.) --Chriswaterguy 06:25, 13 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Revision as of 06:25, 13 February 2009 (edit) Chriswaterguy (talk \| contribs) (New page: I nominate User:David.reber (as discussed by email with User:Curtbeckmann and User:Lonny). --~~~~)		Revision as of 06:31, 13 February 2009 (edit) (undo) Chriswaterguy (talk \| contribs) (community admin) Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I nominate [[User:David.reber]] (as discussed by email with [[User:Curtbeckmann]] and [[User:Lonny]]). --[[User:Chriswaterguy\|Chriswaterguy]] 06:25, 13 February 2009 (UTC)		I nominate [[User:David.reber]] (as discussed by email with [[User:Curtbeckmann]] and [[User:Lonny]]).

			I wish to nominate him for "community admin" - see [[Appropedia:Administrators/Process]]. (That basically means a fully fledged admin. If my suggestion of two levels of adminship doesn't become policy, then this is irrelevant, and I'm just nominating him for admin.) --[[User:Chriswaterguy\|Chriswaterguy]] 06:25, 13 February 2009 (UTC)