Welcome![edit source]


Hi E.Paulin,

Welcome to the Appropedia wiki. Please make yourself at home! If you need a general wiki-tutorial, see the main help page (or the more in-depth one on WikiEducator).

Check your preferences and be sure you verify your email address and turn on email notification if you'd like it -- you can find out when your talk page, or any page on your watchlist, is modified. You may want to upload a photo or information about yourself to your userpage (which is at https://www.appropedia.org/User:E.Paulin).

If you have a particular interest or project in mind, go ahead and start it! If you have questions or suggestions, the best place to leave them is at the Village pump - you should get a fast response. Or, feel free to leave me a note on my talk page if you have further questions, need help finding your way around, have a cool idea for a project, or just want to chat.

Glad to have you here!


Project[edit source]

Really great work - particularly with the e-waste feeder page -- should interlink more.

For multiple uses of the same ref use ref=" " - that will clean up your list a bit. Section 3 still needs filled in - and you should choose one method from 3 and compare it to those given in 2 - discuss the efficiency improvements.

-- Joshua 16:07, 19 November 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Peer Review[edit source]


Nice job so far. Sorry about the tardiness of this review.

I like the intro, and all the statistics are useful, but I think you need a slightly more clear statement of the objectives of this report, and perhaps introduce some of the topics that can be seen on your table of contents. Under the category "Precious metals" there is a bit of a gammatical oddity in the second sentence, and I'm not sure how they was supposed to read. I changed a couple grammatical errors I found, but for the most part, it was well written. One thing that I might suggest, is that many times you give a breakdown (in %) of what compounds and elements are formed by a process, which I like. However, a slightly more detailed explanation as to what these chemicals are, and how they affect the environment, and why they are bad for the environment, would lend some extra validity to your number. And finally, your final category "Progress towards a sustainable future" is the most interesting part of your article, so a little extra explanation with regards to the alternative materials and manufacturing, and your processing plan would improve the overall quality of your article.

These are just my opinions, so feel free to ignore them if you think something works better another way. Nice job so far though, I definitely learned something while reading your article.

-- Robinwilkes 13:39, 24 November 2008

Your impact stats are right here![edit source]


Hi ! Check this out:

Your page Electronic waste has recieved 1968 page views so far, congratz!! Edit the page to keep it up to date!

Also, your user page has received 98 visits! People are interested in knowing more about you, edit your user page to tell the world what you've been up to.

Thanks for your contributions and for making Appropedia great, have a merry green Christmas!!

The Appropedia Team

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.