Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
15 bytes removed ,  18:51, 8 September 2011
m
Line 9: Line 9:  
==Contrarian views==
 
==Contrarian views==
   −
Climate change skeptics{{wp sup|Climate change skeptics}} are a very small and decreasing minority of scientists and a relatively large number of economists. This does not require proving it beyond doubt: consider the practice of the insurance industry to plan for outcomes of varying degrees of likelihood. As the scientific consensus is that there is a very strong probability (the IPCC says 90%{{fact}}) that humans are causing significant climate change, it is vital to prepare for it.  
+
Climate change skeptics{{w|Climate change skeptics}} are a very small and decreasing minority of scientists and a relatively large number of economists. This does not require proving it beyond doubt: consider the practice of the insurance industry to plan for outcomes of varying degrees of likelihood. As the scientific consensus is that there is a very strong probability (the IPCC says 90%{{fact}}) that humans are causing significant climate change, it is vital to prepare for it.  
   −
There is less agreement over the best solutions. For example, the role of [[nuclear energy]] is endorsed by some, but opposed by many, especially environmentalists. The relative importance of climate change as opposed to directly addressing poverty are open to debate.<ref>[[Bjorn Lomborg]]{{wp sup|Bjorn Lomborg}} and the Copenhagen Consensus.{{wp sup|Copenhagen Consensus}} </ref>
+
There is less agreement over the best solutions. For example, the role of [[nuclear energy]] is endorsed by some, but opposed by many, especially environmentalists. The relative importance of climate change as opposed to directly addressing poverty are open to debate.<ref>[[Bjorn Lomborg]]{{w|Bjorn Lomborg}} and the Copenhagen Consensus.{{w|Copenhagen Consensus}} </ref>
    
The positive contribution that climate skeptics can make includes critical analysis of technologies and strategies - this applies when it is considered and informed analysis rather than polemic.
 
The positive contribution that climate skeptics can make includes critical analysis of technologies and strategies - this applies when it is considered and informed analysis rather than polemic.

Navigation menu

MediaWiki spam blocked by CleanTalk.