Response to a Critique: Errors with Acri’s Opinion Piece Defending IP, While Premature Deaths Pile Up from Patents

My recent Health Care Analysis article clearly showed the patent system is responsible for premature deaths using completely transparent calculations and real-world publicly-available data [1]. Rather than offering a rigorous critique, Acri’s non-peer-reviewed opinion piece presents industry-favorable talking points unsupported by the scientific record. The opinion piece is factually inaccurate, riddled with logical flaws and based primarily on unsupported speculation.
A response to feedback on Quantifying the Human Mortality Costs of Patent-based Intellectual Property: How Many Premature Deaths are due to Patents?
See also
[edit | edit source]- Do Universities Investing in Technology Transfer via Patenting Lose Money?
- Open-source 3-D printable autoinjector: Design, testing, and regulatory limitations
- Patent Parasites: Non-Inventors Patenting Existing Open-Source Inventions in the 3-D Printing Technology Space
- Towards open source patents: Semi-automated open hardware certification from MediaWiki websites
- Open Source Database and Website to Provide Free and Open Access to Inactive U.S. Patents in the Public Domain
- A Case for Weakening Patent Rights
- Professors Want to Share: Preliminary Survey Results on Establishing Open Source Endowed Professorships
- Canadian professors' views on establishing open source endowed professorships
- Sponsored Libre Research Agreements to Create Free and Open Source Software and Hardware
keywords = ethics, medical ethics, mortality, human deaths
| License | CC-BY-SA-4.0 |
|---|---|
| Organizations | Free Appropriate Sustainable Technology, Western |
| Cite as | J.M.Pearce (2026). "Response to a Critique: Errors with Acri’s Opinion Piece Defending IP, While Premature Deaths Pile Up from Patents". Appropedia. Retrieved September 15, 2026. |

