Jump to content

Response to a Critique: Errors with Acri’s Opinion Piece Defending IP, While Premature Deaths Pile Up from Patents

From Appropedia
Publication data
Type Paper
Title Response to a Critique: Errors with Acri’s Opinion Piece Defending IP, While Premature Deaths Pile Up from Patents
Authors Joshua M. Pearce
Year 2026
Language English (en)
Location USA
License CC-BY-SA-4.0
Cite as Joshua M. Pearce. Pearce, J.M. Response to a Critique: Errors with Acri’s Opinion Piece Defending IP, While Premature Deaths Pile Up from Patents. Health Care Anal (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-026-00586-x [ OA Academia]
My recent Health Care Analysis article clearly showed the patent system is responsible for premature deaths using completely transparent calculations and real-world publicly-available data [1]. Rather than offering a rigorous critique, Acri’s non-peer-reviewed opinion piece presents industry-favorable talking points unsupported by the scientific record. The opinion piece is factually inaccurate, riddled with logical flaws and based primarily on unsupported speculation.

A response to feedback on Quantifying the Human Mortality Costs of Patent-based Intellectual Property: How Many Premature Deaths are due to Patents?

See also

[edit | edit source]



keywords = ethics, medical ethics, mortality, human deaths
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.