Jump to content

Comparative techno-environmental analysis of grey, blue, green/yellow and pale-blue hydrogen production

From Appropedia
Flow diagram of pale-blue hydrogen production. Full details: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.03.104
Publication data
Type Research
Title Comparative techno-environmental analysis of grey, blue, green/yellow and pale-blue hydrogen production
Description
Authors
Year 2025
Language English (en)
License CC-BY-SA-4.0
Cite as Riya Roy, Giorgio Antonini, Koami S. Hayibo, Md Motakabbir Rahman, Sara Khan, Wei Tian, Michael S.H. Boutilier, Wei Zhang, Ying Zheng, Amarjeet Bassi, Joshua M. Pearce, Comparative techno-environmental analysis of grey, blue, green/yellow and pale-blue hydrogen production, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 116, 2025, 200-210, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.03.104., Academia.edu
Project data
Type
Authors Giorgio Antonini
Koami S. Hayibo
Md Motakabbir Rahman
Sara Khan
Wei Tian
Michael S.H. Boutilier
Wei Zhang
Ying Zheng
Amarjeet Bassi
Joshua M. Pearce
Riya Roy
Location London, ON, Canada
Status Designed
Modelled
Prototyped
Verified
Verified by FAST
Years
Uses renewable energy
OKH Manifest Download

Hydrogen holds immense potential to assist in the transition from fossil fuels to sustainable energy sources, but its environmental impact depends on how it is produced. This study introduces the pale-blue hydrogen production method, which is a hybrid approach, utilizing both carbon capture and bioenergy inputs. Comparative life cycle analysis is shown for grey, blue, green and pale-blue hydrogen using cumulative energy demand, carbon footprint (CF), and water footprint. Additionally, the integration of solar-powered production methods (ground-based photovoltaic and floating photovoltaic (FPV) systems) is examined. The results showed blue hydrogen [steam methane reforming (SMR) + 56% carbon capture storage (CCS)] was 72% less, green hydrogen gas membrane (GM) 75% less, blue hydrogen [SMR+90%CCS] 88% less, and green hydrogen FPV have 90% less CF compared to grey hydrogen. Pale-blue hydrogen [50%B-50%G], blue hydrogen (GM + plasma reactor(PR)) PV and blue hydrogen (GM + PR) FPV offset 26, 48 and 52 times the emissions of grey hydrogen.

Highlights

[edit | edit source]
  • Life cycle analysis: reduced CO2 footprint of pale-blue, blue, and green H2 vs. grey H2.
  • Pale-blue H2 combines solar power, water electrolysis, carbon capture, and bioenergy.
  • Pale-blue and blue (gas membrane + plasma reactor) H2 offsets 26-48X grey H2 emissions.
  • Pale-blue H2 consumes 81.8% lower energy than grey H2, with a CED of 16.6 kWh/kg H2.
  • FPV powered green H2 has the lowest CED at 1.08 kWh per kg H2.
mqdefault.jpgYouTube_icon.svg
mqdefault.jpgYouTube_icon.svg
mqdefault.jpgYouTube_icon.svg
mqdefault.jpgYouTube_icon.svg

See also

[edit | edit source]
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.