Line 24: Line 24:
# Comment:
# Comment:
## Why rate criteria leave such huge margin(40%)?
## Why rate criteria leave such huge margin(40%)?
=== Nitrogen Management Guidelines for Corn in Indiana ===

Revision as of 20:31, 29 January 2015

Sample photo caption.
You can put an abstract (a brief description of your project) here.

Some introduction text and background can go here.

Nitrogen consumption of corn

Nitrogen Management on U.S. Corn Acres, 2001-10

Nitrogen Management on U.S. Corn Acres, 2001-10

  1. Three criteria for good N management
    1. Rate: no more N than 40% more than that removed with crop at harvest.(How second term be determined?)
    2. Timing: no N for crop planted in spring (All corns are planted in spring?)
    3. Method: inject or incorporate instead of broadcasting in soil surface.(What are typical inject or incorporation method?)
  2. Trends
    1. 97% planted corns received N, increased 18% percent from 2001 to 2010.
    2. From 2001 to 2010, national did-not-meet-rate decrease from 41% to 31%. However, timing and method did not improve. Did-not-meet-timing increase from 32% to 35%; did-not-meet-method remained 38%.
    3. N price double from 2000 to 2008, then drop from 2008 to 2010(Why?).
    4. Corn receiving commercial N fertilizer dropped from 84% to 82% while receiving manure increased from 16% to 18%.
    5. Farmer with manure as N source has no improvement(92%) in N-management. This may due to:
      1. Manure is used as a substitute for commercial fertilizer, due to increase price from 2001 to 2008;
      2. Manure is more difficult to manage.
  3. Comment:
    1. Why rate criteria leave such huge margin(40%)?

Nitrogen Management Guidelines for Corn in Indiana

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.