m (Text replacement - "{{Pearce-pubs}}" to "{{Pearce publications notice}}")
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{MOST}}
{{MOST}}
{{Pearce-pubs}}


==Source==
[[File:Fwsun.jpg|thumb]]
*  David C. Denkenberger, Joshua M. Pearce, Ray A. Taylor, Ryan A. Black,  Food without sun: Price and life-saving potential.  ''Foresight'' (2018, in press). [https://www.academia.edu/37257982/Food_without_sun_Price_and_life-saving_potential open access] https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-04-2018-0041


==Abstract==
{{Source data
[[image:Fwsun.jpg|right|400px]]
| type = Paper
| cite-as = David C. Denkenberger, Joshua M. Pearce, Ray A. Taylor, Ryan A. Black, Food without sun: Price and life-saving potential. ''Foresight'' 21(1), pp.118-129 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-04-2018-0041 [https://www.academia.edu/37257982/Food_without_sun_Price_and_life-saving_potential open access]
}}


'''Purpose'''
The purpose of this study is to estimate the price and life-saving potential of alternate foods. The sun could be blocked by asteroid impact, supervolcanic eruption or nuclear winter caused by burning of cities during a nuclear war. The primary problem in these scenarios is loss of food production. Previous work has shown that alternate foods not dependent on sunlight, such as bacteria grown on natural gas and cellulose turned into sugar enzymatically, could feed everyone in these catastrophes, and preparation for these foods would save lives in a manner that is highly cost-effective.


The purpose of this study is to estimate the price and life-saving potential of alternate foods. The sun could be blocked by asteroid impact, supervolcanic eruption or nuclear winter caused by burning of cities during a nuclear war. The primary problem in these scenarios is loss of food production. Previous work has shown that alternate foods not dependent on sunlight, such as bacteria grown on natural gas and cellulose turned into sugar enzymatically, could feed everyone in these catastrophes, and preparation for these foods would save lives in a manner that is highly cost-effective.
{{Pearce publications notice}}


'''Design/methodology/approach'''
'''Design/methodology/approach'''


This study estimates the price of alternate foods during a catastrophe in line with global trade and information sharing, but factors such as migration, loans, aid or conflict are not taken into consideration.
This study estimates the price of alternate foods during a catastrophe in line with global trade and information sharing, but factors such as migration, loans, aid or conflict are not taken into consideration.
   
'''Findings'''
'''Findings'''


Without alternate foods, for a five-year winter, only approximately 10 per cent of the population would survive. The price of dry food would rise to approximately $100/kg, and the expenditure on this food would be approximately $100tn. If alternate foods were $8/kg, the surviving global population increases to approximately 70 per cent, saving >4billion lives.
Without alternate foods, for a five-year winter, only approximately 10 per cent of the population would survive. The price of dry food would rise to approximately $100/kg, and the expenditure on this food would be approximately $100tn. If alternate foods were $8/kg, the surviving global population increases to approximately 70 per cent, saving >4billion lives.
   
'''Research limitations/implications'''
'''Research limitations/implications'''


A nongovernmental mechanism for coordinating the investments of rich people may be possible. Identifying companies whose interests align with alternate food preparations may save lives at a negative cost.
A nongovernmental mechanism for coordinating the investments of rich people may be possible. Identifying companies whose interests align with alternate food preparations may save lives at a negative cost.
   
'''Practical implications'''
'''Practical implications'''


The probability of loss of civilization and its impact on future generations would be lower in this scenario, and the total expenditure on food would be halved.
The probability of loss of civilization and its impact on future generations would be lower in this scenario, and the total expenditure on food would be halved.
    '''
Originality/value'''
'''Originality/value'''


Preparation for alternate foods is a good investment even for wealthy people who would survive without alternate foods.
Preparation for alternate foods is a good investment even for wealthy people who would survive without alternate foods.


==Keywords==
== Keywords ==
  alternate food; global catastrophic risk; nuclear war; existential risk; economics; food
 
==See Also==
  alternate food; global catastrophic risk; nuclear war; existential risk; economics; food
{|style="border:2px solid black; background-color: lightgreen; margin-left:.1em; margin-top:2px; -moz-border-radius:15px;" align="right" width="100px"
!<big>Feeding Everyone No Matter What</big>
|-
|<center>{{#widget:YouTube|id=_Lpz40xaDxM}} </center>
|-
|}


[[image:Foodweb.png|400px|right]]
== See also ==
* [[Feeding Everyone No Matter What]] - The full book main page
* [https://sites.google.com/site/daviddenkenberger/beliefs David Denkenberger] and [[User:J.M.Pearce| Joshua Pearce]], [http://store.elsevier.com/Feeding-Everyone-No-Matter-What/Joshua-Pearce/isbn-9780128021507/ Feeding Everyone No Matter What: Managing Food Security After Global Catastrophe ], 1<sup>st</sup> Edition, Academic Press, 2015
* Free Preview: [http://books.google.com/books?id=zP2cBAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false Google books]
* [https://www.academia.edu/9416519/Feeding_Everyone_No_Matter_What_Managing_Food_Security_After_Global_Catastrophe Cover on Academia]
* [https://www.facebook.com/FeedingEveryoneNoMatterWhat Facebook page]
* [[ Alternative Foods as a Solution to Global Food Supply Catastrophes]]
* [[Resilience to global food supply catastrophes]]
* [[Feeding Everyone if the Sun is Obscured and Industry is Disabled]]
* [[Cost-Effectiveness of Interventions for Alternate Food to Address Agricultural Catastrophes Globally]]
* [https://sites.google.com/site/daviddenkenberger/publications Dave Denkenberger Publications]
* [[Feeding Everyone: Solving the Food Crisis in Event of Global Catastrophes that Kill Crops or Obscure the Sun]]
* [[Cost-effectiveness of interventions for alternate food in the United States to address agricultural catastrophes]]
* OSE Wiki [http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/Synfood "Synfood"] (i.e. protein and other dietary components from microbial organisms fed on gas or other hydrocarbons)


===Davos IDRC Conference===
{{Alt-food}}
*[[Feeding Everyone if Industry is Disabled]]
*[[Providing Non-food Needs if Industry is Disabled]]
*[[Vitamins in Agricultural Catastrophes]]
*[[Integrative Risk Management for Catastrophe Destroying 10-20% of Global Food Supply]]


[[Category:MOST completed projects and publications]]
{{Page data}}
[[Category:Famine relief]]
[[Category:Farming]]
[[Category:Food]]
[[Category:Food and agriculture]]
[[Category:Food crops]]
[[Category:Food processing]]
[[Category:Food production]]
[[Category:Food safety]]
[[Category:Food security]]
[[Category:Food storage]]

Latest revision as of 16:41, 14 July 2023

Fwsun.jpg
FA info icon.svg Angle down icon.svg Source data
Type Paper
Cite as Citation reference for the source document. David C. Denkenberger, Joshua M. Pearce, Ray A. Taylor, Ryan A. Black, Food without sun: Price and life-saving potential. Foresight 21(1), pp.118-129 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-04-2018-0041 open access

The purpose of this study is to estimate the price and life-saving potential of alternate foods. The sun could be blocked by asteroid impact, supervolcanic eruption or nuclear winter caused by burning of cities during a nuclear war. The primary problem in these scenarios is loss of food production. Previous work has shown that alternate foods not dependent on sunlight, such as bacteria grown on natural gas and cellulose turned into sugar enzymatically, could feed everyone in these catastrophes, and preparation for these foods would save lives in a manner that is highly cost-effective.

Design/methodology/approach

This study estimates the price of alternate foods during a catastrophe in line with global trade and information sharing, but factors such as migration, loans, aid or conflict are not taken into consideration.

Findings

Without alternate foods, for a five-year winter, only approximately 10 per cent of the population would survive. The price of dry food would rise to approximately $100/kg, and the expenditure on this food would be approximately $100tn. If alternate foods were $8/kg, the surviving global population increases to approximately 70 per cent, saving >4billion lives.

Research limitations/implications

A nongovernmental mechanism for coordinating the investments of rich people may be possible. Identifying companies whose interests align with alternate food preparations may save lives at a negative cost.

Practical implications

The probability of loss of civilization and its impact on future generations would be lower in this scenario, and the total expenditure on food would be halved.

Originality/value

Preparation for alternate foods is a good investment even for wealthy people who would survive without alternate foods.

Keywords[edit | edit source]

alternate food; global catastrophic risk; nuclear war; existential risk; economics; food

See also[edit | edit source]

mqdefault.jpgYouTube_icon.svg
Feeding Everyone No Matter What
Foodweb.png

Additional Information[edit source]

Davos IDRC Conference[edit source]

FA info icon.svg Angle down icon.svg Page data
Authors Joshua M. Pearce
License CC-BY-SA-3.0
Language English (en)
Related 0 subpages, 37 pages link here
Impact 836 page views
Created August 19, 2018 by Joshua M. Pearce
Modified July 14, 2023 by Felipe Schenone
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.