Comparison of IC motors   

From Appropedia
Jump to: navigation, search

This article compares the IC engines, primarily on their power/weight ratio; this being a key issue to assess the usability of an engine for a particular task (ie transport, local power transformation, ...). Primarily the difficulty of repair/convertion and durability is important, since most engines will probably be scavenged and repaired, rather than built. Only 4-stroke engines are mentioned, since 2-stroke engines can't be converted to a emissionless IC-engine.

Type Difficulty of repair Difficulty of convertion to emissionless ICE Power-to-weight Durability Production cost Fabrication requirements Difficulty of production
Engines using liquid matter cooling
ICE straight engine  ?  ?  ? medium  ??  ?
ICE V-engine  ?  ?  ?  ? ??  ?
ICE W-engine  ?  ?  ?  ??  ?  ?
Opposed piston engine  ?  ?  ?  ??  ?  ?
ICE X-engine  ?  ?  ?  ??  ?  ?
Engines using solid matter cooling
ICE straight engine [1]  ?  ?  ? good-medium  ?  ?
ICE radial engine  ?  ? better then solid matter cooled ICE straight engine good  ?  ?
ICE rotary engine  ?  ? better then solid matter cooled ICE straight engine good  ?  ?

Common sources:

  • lawn mower engine --> ICE straight engine, solid matter cooled. Power rating: around 12 HP. Can appearantly be modified upto 35 HP [2]
  • weed wacker engine --> ?

Note: is there a method to calculate power rating from cilinder contents x amount of cylinders x fuel burned ? Would be useful if power rating is not mentioned on engine.

Note 2: Not sure whether there is a difference in difficulty of repair between older and newer ICE straight engines; appearantly spark ignition was timed only using the timing belt in the past whereas now, sensors are used [3]; sensor doesn't seem too diffult to make though

Note 3: Finally, not sure whether ICE (straight) engines can have their starter system removed (this normally happens using a starter engine connected to the flywheel). This is quite important as it requires not only the extra starter engine, but also a lead-acid battery for the starting. Both add weight, additional difficulty in repair, and extra requirements (ie lead-acid SLI batteries need to have certain level of starting power, actually require temperature regulation, ...) A hand or leg-based starter system, as seen in the AT e-velomobile would simplify things greatly.

Note 4: Not sure whether lawn mower engines actually have a starter engine, this is probably simply swapped with the starter cord. Also, lawn mower engines do not have a spark ignition system using a battery, rather they use simple magneto's (which is a magnet generating power directly from the rotation of the flywheel

Applications:

  • lawn mower motor --> use in flexwing microlights, if improved to 35 HP
  • weed wacker --> use on motorised bicycles, light ground vehicles (ie AT e-velomobile) [4]
  • car engine --> 100 HP - 200 HP, use in transport aircraft, if several are used per single aircraft
  • ...

[edit] See also

[edit] External links

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engine_configuration

[edit] References

  1. Lawn mower engine being solid matter cooled
  2. U.S. Lawn Mower Racing Association (USMLRA); Wreckreation Nation documentary
  3. Zo werkt uw auto by Carel Zaal
  4. Mail George Tetz
Personal tools